However, Samsung said in a separate filing on Wednesday that its offer "is consistent with the royalty rates other companies charge" and that Apple never made a counter offer.
"Instead, it simply rejected Samsung's opening offer, refused to negotiate further and to this day has not paid Samsung a dime for Apple‘s use of Samsung's standards-essential technology," Samsung said.
The legal filings do not disclose the rate Apple pays to other companies for standard essential patents. These are patents which Samsung has agreed to license to competitors on fair and reasonable terms, in exchange for having the technology be adopted as an industry standard.
In a court filing on Tuesday, Apple had said it should pay one-half of 1 cent per unit for each infringed standard essential patent.
Apple and Samsung, the world's largest consumer electronics corporations, are waging legal war around the world, accusing each other of patent violations as they vie for supremacy in a fast-growing market for mobile devices.
One of the key issues in dispute between the companies is how to value Samsung's standard essential patents, which some judges are reluctant to issue injunctions over.
A trial in San Jose, California, federal court is scheduled to start July 30.
The case in U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, is Apple Inc v. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd et al, 11-1846.
(Additional reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Gerald E. McCormick and Richard Chang)
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Email
- Reprints
Comments (0)
Be the first to comment on reuters.com.
Add yours using the box above.
0 comments:
Post a Comment