Thursday, May 31, 2012

Reuters: Technology News: Chic geeks give San Francisco a new tech groove

Reuters: Technology News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Chic geeks give San Francisco a new tech groove
Jun 1st 2012, 05:03

By Peter Henderson

SAN FRANCISCO | Fri Jun 1, 2012 1:03am EDT

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - The YouTube video, featuring a young blonde sitting in a strikingly modern San Francisco home, offers a telling insight into the attitudes that are shifting the geography of the Bay Area technology scene.

"Who has a party in Palo Alto?" she asks the camera, in a dig at the suburban capital of Silicon Valley that helped make the two-minute comedy, "Shit Silicon Valley Says," a Web hit. For many of the twentysomething engineers and other professionals who play a central role in the latest Internet boom, the question is purely rhetorical.

More than ever, technology entrepreneurs, and their investors and employees, are choosing the urban charms of San Francisco over the sprawl of neighboring Silicon Valley. In the South of Market district, the nexus of the city's tech industry, rents are soaring and latte lines are lengthening - conjuring memories of the dot-com bubble of the late 1990s.

Late last year the city had 34,000 tech jobs, topping the high set at the peak of the dot-com boom in 2001, according to a Jones Lang LaSalle analysis of California Employment Development Department data. Twitter, Salesforce.com, Zynga, Yelp and other sizable Internet companies now call the city home.

Half or more of graduates of the tech incubator Y Combinator, a widely watched Silicon Valley institution, now move to San Francisco, founder Paul Graham said by email. Four years ago, he said, the city lacked the seriousness of purpose that infuses Silicon Valley. "I'm suspicious when startups choose SF," he wrote at the time. "Things have changed," he declared recently.

"This is really where the center of gravity is," agreed Y Combinator graduate Dan Siroker. He worked for Google in Mountain View but started his own business, a company that lets businesses test versions of websites, called Optimizely, in San Francisco. And the profitable company just got a round of venture funding.

That's not to say that Silicon Valley, which extends roughly 40 miles south of the city to San Jose and includes towns such as Palo Alto, Menlo Park and Cupertino, is no longer central to the tech scene.

San Francisco captured 20 percent of all venture capital funding in the last quarter of last year, its best showing ever, according to a report by Pricewaterhouse Coopers and the National Venture Capital Association based on Thomson Reuters data. Silicon Valley accounted for a strong 27 percent of all VC investment in the same period.

Memories of the dot-com bust, which left parts of the South of Market district all but abandoned for a time and sent rents -and restaurants - into a free fall, also loom large.

But the new generation of Internet companies has a more real-world, and arguably more urban, outlook. Customers of car service Uber, for instance, see a map of nearby cars on their smartphone app and can calls one over in minutes.

Sahil Lavingia, who dropped out of college in Los Angeles to work at Pinterest in Palo Alto, is among those attracted by the city. Last year he left Pinterest and headed north, starting his own online payment service, Gumroad, which lets sellers tweet their wares and bears the design sense that is a hallmark of the San Francisco scene.

"I moved up here for two reasons. One is that Palo Alto is really boring," the 19-year-old chief executive officer said. "For me personally, it's boring. And two, it's boring for other people." To be fair, he says, San Francisco parties are boring, because the people you really want to meet are home working. But the city is international, diverse - and has the people he wants to hire.

WI-FI BUSES

Blame the urban revolution on Google, which like so many tech companies was born at Stanford University in Palo Alto. A van pool started by a single Googler in 2004 has turned into a massive system of private buses that hum with the clicks of laptop computers hooked into the onboard Wi-Fi. About a third of Google's employees - about 3,500 as of late last year - climb on a bus twice a day, mostly heading to or from San Francisco.

The environmental effects of the buses are debatable. They take cars off the road, as Google points out, but they also facilitate employees moving far from the company's Mountain View campus. Buses from Facebook and Genentech now crowd San Francisco neighborhoods along with those of Google.

Facebook's decision in 2008 to cancel a housing subsidy for those living near its Palo Alto headquarters removed the last barrier to moving for hipsters in Silicon Valley, says Kevin Hartz, founder of San Francisco-based Eventbrite, an online service for organizing real-world events, from arts fairs to political campaign rallies.

Nowadays, many young techies with jobs in Silicon Valley settle in San Francisco, seduced by the ease of the commute on a cushy bus.

Every day, though, that bus passes SOMA residents strolling to work. "What a bus!" turns to "Why a bus?"

Eventbrite should consider putting up an "If you worked here, you'd be home" billboard, Hartz jokes. "We think that they purposely send the buses onto the freeway away from SOMA these days," he said. "If they came up the Sixth Street on-ramp, they'd literally be going right by our office."

A MATTER OF CHARACTER

There are still plenty of reasons that San Francisco is not a great place for business, starting with taxes. Among them is the city's unusual 1.5 percent local payroll tax, which the business community views as a jobs killer.

Mayor Ed Lee, a mild liberal technocrat, last year helped shield companies going public from the brunt of city taxes - and thus narrowly avoided losing Twitter to suburbia. Now he wants to swap a payroll tax for a revenue tax or other alternative.

"It's all about compromise, and the good news is all of the constituencies are working together," said Ron Conway, a prominent supporter of Lee and an angel investor known for seeding hundreds of early-stage companies.

Conway moved back to San Francisco from the Valley eight years ago for personal reasons. His business followed suit - now 60 percent of the roughly 200 companies his SVAngel portfolio holds are based in the city. Five year ago, three-quarters were in Silicon Valley.

But local progressives - the ultra-liberals who give the city its far-left reputation - have vociferously opposed the tax breaks, arguing that the payroll tax reflects the cost of city services and that newcomers should not be favored over the folks who give San Francisco its character.

The city turned more politically progressive after the "unchecked excesses" of the dot-com boom a decade ago, said Aaron Peskin, a former head of the Board of Supervisors, San Francisco's city council. "I'm always amazed by human beings' ability to conveniently repress recent history," he said.

The last tech boom created jobs - and ill will, Peskin noted. "When you are not taking care of people and families who have lived here for generations and made this the city that it is, it's a little lopsided."

Lee was heckled at an April neighborhood meeting near Golden Gate Park. Residents said he was giving handouts to wealthy tech companies as costs for average San Franciscans went through the roof.

Politics aside, high rents could eventually be problematic for businesses, too. Class B offices, including the industrial-looking lofts that tech startups love, currently go for around $43 per square foot and are climbing, according to Colliers International, a real estate broker. The square-foot rate is double that in 2003, though still comfortably below the 2001 peak of $65.

GROWN-UPS PREFER SILICON VALLEY?

Silicon Valley still has major advantages as a location, including wide-open tracts that can accommodate large corporate campuses. Before his death, Steve Jobs announced a plan for a 2.8-million-square-foot doughnut-spaceship-shaped headquarters for Apple on 126 acres in Cupertino, which would have nature walks, restaurants - and parking.

"As startups get beyond startup stage and start hiring people, they look to move out of San Francisco," said Chuck Reed, the mayor of Silicon Valley capital San Jose, where Cisco Systems Inc's campus stretches along several stops of the city's light-rail system.

One of Cisco's former top executives, Mike Volpi, recently returned to Silicon Valley after a few years abroad. It's a good place to raise a family, he says. But Volpi drives north to SOMA every morning, talking to his European colleagues at venture capital firm Index, which established its West Coast headquarters in San Francisco.

"Skate to where the puck is going to be," he said, quoting a hockey adage.

The high-ceilinged, white-walled Index office, accented with steel and blond wood, is all San Francisco style. And Volpi and the young company CEOs with whom he meets can visit one another on foot.

(Additional reporting by Gerry Shih in San Francisco)

(Reporting By Peter Henderson; Editing by Jonathan Weber and Douglas Royalty)

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Technology News: Analysis: Nasdaq plays tough with clients angry over Facebook

Reuters: Technology News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Analysis: Nasdaq plays tough with clients angry over Facebook
Jun 1st 2012, 04:05

Recent activity lists ''Mark listed FB on NASDAQ'' in this image taken from Mark Zuckerberg's Facebook page on May 18, 2012. REUTERS/Staff

Recent activity lists ''Mark listed FB on NASDAQ'' in this image taken from Mark Zuckerberg's Facebook page on May 18, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Staff

By John McCrank

NEW YORK | Fri Jun 1, 2012 12:05am EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - It's crisis communications 101 for Corporate America: when a company bungles an event as big as the Facebook IPO, alienates customers, and spawns lawsuits and regulatory inquiries, the CEO apologizes and agrees to provide compensation to make things right. Everyone can then move on.

Not so at Nasdaq OMX Group, where technology glitches and a communications breakdown marred Facebook's $16 billion initial public offering on May 18.

Since then, the exchange has done little to conciliate market making clients - a number of which lost tens of millions of dollars each due to the trading problems. There has been no outright apology. And as angry as some customers may be, experts say they have little alternative but to keep trading on the exchange.

And they have. Nasdaq's trading volume this week is above the monthly average, and its share price is nearly unchanged two weeks after the trading glitch.

Nasdaq, one of only two U.S. exchanges on which companies can list their shares, is home to a raft of heavily traded household technology names such as Apple and Google, and has challenged the New York Stock Exchange for marquee listings. The Facebook IPO was seen as a major coup.

With so few options for traders, Nasdaq's strong position is giving confidence to investors and analysts.

"We expect this to blow over with time," said Chris Allen, an analyst at Evercore Partners, in a note to clients.

Many of Nasdaq's customers sing a different tune, however. During the first day of Facebook trading, technical glitches left the market makers - who facilitate trades for brokers and are crucial to the smooth operation of stock trading - in the dark for hours as to which trades had gone through.

The result was up to $115 million in losses for the Nasdaq's top four market makers alone. Two senior executives in the financial industry have said they expect Nasdaq member claims to total $150 million to $200 million.

Nasdaq's response amounted to a members-only call with one of its executive vice presidents, a statement that the exchange would set aside a pool of $13.7 million to accommodate losses, and a brief mention of Facebook during the company's shareholders meeting. Greifeld also hosted Nasdaq's party at a technology conference this week in California.

A source close to the exchange said it is reaching out to affected clients. Yet some big clients are still unhappy.

"Communication has been about as good as it was on the day of the IPO - minimal," said Mark Turner, head of trading at New York-based market maker Instinet.

Turner declined to say how much his firm lost but said it paled in comparison with losses suffered by larger counterparts like UBS, Citigroup, Knight Capital, and Citadel Securities, which lost between $20 million and $35 million.

THROWING OUT THE CRISIS PR PLAYBOOK

In most corners of Corporate America, such a situation would have driven executives into crisis communications overload.

Regular communication, not necessarily more, is the best way to handle a crisis situation, said John McInerney, a global vice president at public relations firm Makovsky and Co.

"Just saying 'we are going to talk to you at 4:00 or at a certain point and we are going to tell you where things are right now,' I think people can live with that kind of uncertainty as long as they know they are going to hear something," he said. "And that didn't happen."

On a call with select reporters the Sunday after the Facebook IPO, Greifeld said Nasdaq was "humbly embarrassed" over the trading glitch, but he stopped short of a public apology.

"They have failed in executing a comprehensive or cohesive communications strategy," said Michael Robinson, a former U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission public affairs and policy chief who also spent three years in media relations at Nasdaq.

"Here we are a couple of weeks later and I'm still not entirely sure what it is they said went wrong," said Robinson, who is now an executive vice president at Levick Strategic Communications.

It's a sharp contrast to the way rival exchange BATS Global Markets handled a major crisis - the withdrawal of its own IPO on its own exchange in March after a technological glitch disrupted trading. Joe Ratterman, chief executive of BATS, was on television the next day taking the blame and explaining why the company pulled the plug.

The incident was an embarrassment at the time, but now market participants say BATS' swift response looks like a brilliant move compared with Nasdaq's inaction.

"Although they were highly criticized, guess what, no one lost any money, other than maybe the BATS guys. But ... investors didn't lose," said a financial industry executive who declined to be named because of the sensitivity of the issue.

"MODUS OPERANDI"

A lack of public communication is partly protective - lawsuits against Nasdaq by disgruntled investors are stacking up. But many people who deal with Nasdaq regularly, or are familiar with how it has handled its customer relationships, say even if there were no legal issues, the silence and lack of contrition expressed to market makers is par for the course.

"This is their modus operandi," said independent trading and market structure consultant William Karsh, a former chief operating officer of rival electronic exchange Direct Edge. "They screw the wholesalers because they can. At the end of the day, the wholesalers have no choice but to use them - they are still a huge liquidity pool."

Nasdaq declined to comment for this article.

Nasdaq's liabilities for a trading glitch are limited through regulation and a contract with its customers to $3 million per month. The exchange has applied to the SEC to increase the amount to $13.7 million to include a gain of $10.7 million it made from the Facebook IPO through the sale of shares it was left holding due to the technology glitches.

"They are certainly facing the specter of some significant lawsuits if this pool is not enough," said an attorney who is familiar with the situation.

The customers are arguing that the limit on liabilities should not apply because the Facebook problems were the result of gross negligence.

While its trading customers have little option but to stick with Nasdaq to do their business, the longer-term risk for the exchange is not landing the next Facebook.

"The Nasdaq has just handed the New York Stock Exchange the best marketing bonanza they could ever hope for," said Robinson.

(Reporting By John McCrank; editing by Jennifer Merritt and Edward Tobin, Martin Howell)

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Technology News: Analysis: RIM's new woes seen speeding loss of BlackBerry users

Reuters: Technology News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Analysis: RIM's new woes seen speeding loss of BlackBerry users
Jun 1st 2012, 04:07

A man walks out of the Blackberry maker's Research in Motion RIM campus in Waterloo April 18, 2012. REUTERS/Mark Blinch

A man walks out of the Blackberry maker's Research in Motion RIM campus in Waterloo April 18, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Mark Blinch

By Nicola Leske and Jim Finkle

Fri Jun 1, 2012 12:07am EDT

(Reuters) - Research In Motion's appointment of bankers to advise on drastic options, including an outright sale of the BlackBerry maker, may only hasten moves by major customers to offer their employees smartphones produced by rivals.

An increasing number of top companies and government departments that were once devoted to the Blackberry are instead now giving some staff the option of using Apple Inc's iPhone or smartphones running off of Google Inc's Android-operating system.

There is now a real danger for RIM that such switching will gather pace and turn into a much bigger exodus of customers, mobile phone industry consultants and experts warned.

The uncertainty surrounding RIM's future, and the possibility of a sale, is "scary to an end user," said John Hering, chief executive of Lookout, one of the world's biggest providers of mobile security products.

Within 12 hours of RIM's announcement, Hering said, he heard from several corporate technology executives troubled by the news.

"RIM is looking at it as 'How can we maximize the value of an asset' as opposed to 'How can we solve problems for the customer?' That is making customers nervous," he said.

RIM told Reuters in a statement it had not noticed an increase in inquiries from customers after it disclosed the review.

"RIM is in regular communication with our corporate customers to share updates and to keep them apprised of our ongoing efforts to refocus the company and to continue meeting their needs," the statement said. "As such, we have noticed no measurable increase in the number of questions or concerns following (the) update."

On Tuesday, RIM said it had hired deal-making bankers from JPMorgan Chase and Royal Bank of Canada to help it do a far-reaching review of its business. The Canadian company also shocked investors by reporting it expected a fiscal first-quarter loss, and said it was looking at a significant number of job cuts. Sources have indicated it may cut as many as 6,500 of its 16,500 jobs.

The company's share price has collapsed in the past year, and it is now only valued at about $5.4 billion, down from $84 billion at its peak in 2008. Excluding its cash and the estimated value of its patents, RIM's device business and its 78 million subscribers around the world are in aggregate worth less than $1 billion to investors.

LOST CONFIDENCE

Retaining its customers' loyalty is a huge challenge.

"The organizations using multiple devices have lost confidence in BlackBerry as a platform for the long term," said Alex Bratton, CEO of Lextech Global Services, a company that creates mobile applications for companies.

He added that as "people are doing hardware refreshes they are going in another direction."

Fernando Alvarez, head of mobile solutions for IT services company Cap Gemini, said the company is rarely asked to do projects using the BlackBerry platform anymore.

The BlackBerry dominated the market for mobile email until the iPhone was introduced in 2007 but is now third in market share.

General Electric Co now says about one-third of the mobile devices it issues to employees are iPhones. Other big companies that have started to use a range of different devices include Amgen Inc, FedEx Corp, Caterpillar Inc and Cisco Systems Inc.

A spokesperson for the U.S. Department of Defense, one of RIM's biggest customers, declined to comment on RIM's strategic review or discuss any contingency plans if the company gets into further trouble.

Earlier this month, RIM announced that the Pentagon had cleared six new BlackBerry models for use on its networks, extending their long relationship.

The Pentagon has begun small pilot programs using other devices, according to Federal Computer Weekly, a publication that tracks U.S. government spending on technology. It estimates the U.S. military has 250,000 BlackBerrys, 5,000 iOS devices and 3,000 Android-run devices.

EMPLOYEE DEMAND

The trend away from RIM has been fueled partly by demand from workers who crave the usability of devices running Apple's iOS and Google's Android, and do not want to carry several smartphones. A massive network outage last October that meant millions of BlackBerry users lost use of email for many hours also pushed technology buyers to look at alternatives.

"If it were up to IT managers, BlackBerry would still be the device of choice, but with employees bringing their own devices there is no going back," said Dan Croft, CEO of Mission Critical Wireless.

RIM's advantages include what industry experts widely describe as superior security and device-management features that have made the BlackBerry appealing to corporate IT managers and a crucial tool for police, government and military use.

Apple and Google are adding new features in these areas with each new release of their software but have yet to catch up with RIM, said Dino Dai Zovi, a leading expert on mobile device security who is chief technology officer of consulting firm Trail of Bits.

Still, with companies such as Symantec Corp and SAP's Sybase division offering mobile device management software that secures, monitors and controls mobile devices, companies are no longer tethered to the BlackBerry for security reasons.

While those technologies are not yet as advanced as RIM's offerings, they are sufficient for securing and managing email for many corporate workers, security experts said.

Apple's iOS and Android are "ready for prime time" for all but the highest-risk users, Lookout's Hering said.

A company's ability to shift to other devices can sometimes depend on how much mobile equipment it has on its books. Throwing out those devices before they have depreciated in value could have big financial implications, according to Gary Curtis, who works with financial services companies in his role as chief technology strategist at outsourcing company Accenture.

But others say it would not be that difficult.

Lynden Tennison, the chief information officer of U.S. railroad Union Pacific Corp - which is still mainly a BlackBerry customer - said that he had a plan for a worst-case scenario:

"If RIM went away, was bought or went bankrupt what would we do? We could very easily transition to another provider," he said. If it happened overnight "we would be busy for a week or two provisioning phones, but it's not like it would put us in a serious world of hurt."

(Additional reporting by Sinead Carew, Lynn Adler, Phil Wahba in New York, Jim Wolf in Washington, Scott Malone in Boston and Alastair Sharp in Toronto.; Editing by Peter Lauria, Martin Howell)

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Technology News: Google accuses Microsoft, Nokia of mobile collusion

Reuters: Technology News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Google accuses Microsoft, Nokia of mobile collusion
Jun 1st 2012, 02:51

Nokia chief executive Stephen Elop (L) welcomes Microsoft chief executive Steve Ballmer with a handshake at a Nokia event in London February 11, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Luke MacGregor

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Technology News: After Facebook, Silicon Valley warily eyes Square

Reuters: Technology News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
After Facebook, Silicon Valley warily eyes Square
Jun 1st 2012, 00:56

The Facebook logo is seen on a screen inside at the Nasdaq Marketsite in New York May 18, 2012. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton

The Facebook logo is seen on a screen inside at the Nasdaq Marketsite in New York May 18, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Shannon Stapleton

By Sarah McBride

SAN FRANCISCO | Thu May 31, 2012 8:56pm EDT

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - As Silicon Valley scrambles to assess the impact of the Facebook (FB.O) IPO mess, all eyes are on Square.

The much-heralded, next-generation payments company had been aiming to raise its next round of venture capital funds at a valuation of as much as $4 billion - up from $1 billion just a year ago. That is the sort of acceleration in valuation that happened with Facebook prior to its public market debut.

But with Facebook worth $26 billion less than it was just two weeks ago, industry insiders say that concerns about over-exuberance around social media and other Internet companies -- which began to emerge late last year -- have mounted.

"There's a chill settling in over the market," said one late-stage venture capitalist. "Going back to reality is helpful," he added.

The ability of Square, and a handful of other hot Internet start-ups, including Asana, Just Fabulous and Ideeli, to raise money at super-premium valuations is now shaping up as a test of whether Facebook's IPO marks a turning point in the latest tech boom.

Facebook's IPO was a success by one key metric - raising the maximum possible amount of cash in public markets for the company and early investors - but it was a massive failure for later-stage investors and people who bought Facebook shares at the IPO price of $38. The shares traded at $28 on Thursday afternoon.

A number of high-profile start-ups had the luck or foresight to raise money from venture capitalists just ahead of the Facebook IPO. Question-and-answer service Quora, founded by Facebook alumni, raised $50 million recently at a reported $400 million valuation, even though it has no revenue. Online bulletin board Pinterest raised $100 million at a $1.5 billion valuation.

But those who did not get their deals done before the Facebook offering could be in a tricky spot.

Workplace-collaboration network Asana has been talking to venture capitalists about a new round of funding in the $20 million to $30 million range, two sources said. The new round would value the company at around $250 million. Online retailers JustFabulous and Ideeli are both seeking to raise $30 million to$50 million at a $300 million to $500 million valuation, according to another source who had talked to those companies before the Facebook IPO.

The most visible of all is Square, a company run by Twitter co-founder and Silicon Valley darling Jack Dorsey. Square aims to reinvent the payment function with mobile devices and sophisticated software and identity technologies.

Square announced a $100 million investment led by Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers last June, valuing the company at $1 billion. Other backers include Sequoia Capital, Tiger Global Management, and Visa (V.N). Venture capitalists say it is seeking a $4 billion valuation for its next round. A Square spokesman declined to comment.

Venture capitalists generally try to invest in companies they think will be worth at least three to five times more than their initial investment by the time the companies get acquired or go public.

That means Square, to justify a $4 billion valuation, would have to be worth at least $12 billion in a few years - a tall order for a company operating in a business with slim margins, deep-pocketed and established players, and lots of fraud.

Square's fans counter that it is growing quickly and has a unique opportunity to leverage social-media platforms and upend entrenched businesses that are short on innovation.

Asana might have an easier story to sell. It is run by Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz, and the steady monthly revenue it gets from its best customers - a premium service launched in April - could make it popular with investors looking for reliability as well as growth.

Still, the advantage Asana was perceived to enjoy due to enthusiasm around social networks in general and Facebook in particular could now look more like a liability. A spokesman for Asana declined to comment on financing.

JustFabulous and Ideeli may have a tougher time, some venture capitalists say. JustFabulous co-Chief Executive Adam Goldenberg said the company does not comment on financing. A spokeswoman for Ideeli declined to comment.

Most e-commerce companies eventually are acquired at about one to 1.5 times revenue, but in the early stages they ask for valuations of five or 10 times revenue, venture capitalists say. That means a company would have to increase revenue by a factor of 15 for a venture capitalist to make three times its return.

Very high valuations can also create another problem in that they limit the pool of potential acquirers. At a 10-figure valuation, companies including Apple (AAPL.O), Facebook, Google (GOOG.O) or Microsoft (MSFT.O) are almost the only possible buyers - an especially important issue if the IPO market as a whole goes dormant for a time.

Asana last raised funds in 2009, when Andreessen Horowitz and Benchmark Capital committed $10 million. JustFab raised $33 million last year, and Ideeli has raised a total of $70 million, including $41 million last year.

"I think the valuations in the private market are high," said Mary Meeker, a former star Internet analyst and now a partner at venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers.

Speaking at the "D" conference in Southern California, where many Internet industry leaders gathered this week, she added: "We run a billion-dollar digital growth fund at Kleiner Perkins, and we didn't invest a penny in the March quarter ... We just were having trouble getting comfortable."

In recent months, valuations "went crazy," said Loic Le Meur, chief executive of Internet conference Le Web, speaking on the sidelines of the "D" conference. "If it cools down a little bit for valuations, I don't think it's a bad thing."

Still, not everyone in Silicon Valley thinks private-company valuations are going to take a big hit.

"When you look a year from now, two years from now, I'm not sure you're going to say prices came down at high-quality companies," said Sergio Monsalve, an investor at Norwest.

For venture capitalists, "growth is such a huge factor," said GGV Capital's Glenn Solomon. "And there's still a ton of growth out there."

(Reporting By Sarah McBride in San Francisco and Alexei Oreskovic in Rancho Palos Verdes, Calif.; Editing by Jonathan Weber and Steve Orlofsky)

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Technology News: Facebook makes a comeback, options volume soars

Reuters: Technology News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Facebook makes a comeback, options volume soars
May 31st 2012, 22:14

Facebook logos on a computer screen are seen in this photo illustration taken in Lavigny May 16, 2012. REUTERS/Valentin Flauraud

Facebook logos on a computer screen are seen in this photo illustration taken in Lavigny May 16, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Valentin Flauraud

By Doris Frankel and Edwin Chan

Thu May 31, 2012 6:14pm EDT

(Reuters) - Facebook Inc bounced back from record lows in frenetic trading on Thursday to finish in positive territory for the first time in four days, lifted in late trade by a U.S. market rebound and a brokerage upgrade.

Facebook, the No. 1 Internet social network and first U.S. company to debut with a capitalization of more than $100 billion, rose 5 percent to close at $29.60. Options volume skyrocketed with bets ranging from a sharp rebound to a sustained selloff, promising more volatility to come.

Facebook remains 22 percent below its $38 IPO price, walloped by doubts about its lofty valuation and ability to sustain the rapid growth that has made it a business and cultural phenomenon.

On Thursday, Pivotal Research analyst Brian Wiesner -- among the first to slap a "sell" rating on the stock -- upgraded the shares to hold, arguing that the current price incorporated much of the inherent risk in Facebook's business.

"Short-term we are still cautious but there should be reasons for optimism later this year and next," said Wiesner, who put a sell on the stock when Facebook first priced its IPO.

Wall Street remains concerned that Facebook, while boasting nearly a billion users worldwide and dominating Internet social networking, will have difficulty translating its growing presence on smartphones and other mobile devices into revenue.

Analysts say wringing profits from smartphone users is crucial to long-term growth, particularly with rivals Google Inc and Apple Inc dominating the mobile arena.

The current weakness "feels a lot like it's macro-driven as much as anything," Wieser said. By late 2012, "Facebook will by then have cycled through difficult comps and investors can better focus on the fundamental growth story."

U.S. stocks fell on Thursday. The S&P 500 ended May with its largest monthly drop since September, as investors focused on European credit problems.

Before their late bounce, Facebook shares had sunk to a record low of $26.83, representing a loss of about $30 billion in market value since a botched May 18 initial public offering.

Earlier on Thursday, S&P Capital IQ cut its target on the stock to $27 from $30 and maintained a "sell" rating. The company debuted at $38.

Facebook's $16 billion IPO punctuated years of breakneck growth for a social network born eight years ago in Mark Zuckerberg's Harvard dorm room. But the offering was plagued with problems.

A software error on Nasdaq OMX Group Inc's U.S. exchange delayed the start of trade by 30 minutes. Then, claims of selective disclosure about slowing growth in the days leading up to the IPO engulfed the company in controversy, as did perceptions among some investors that the stock was overpriced coming out the gate.

APPLE-LIKE NUMBERS

Skeptics had argued even before the botched debut and subsequent selloff that the starting valuation of more than $100 billion -- equivalent to that of Amazon.com Inc and exceeding that of Hewlett-Packard Co and Dell Inc combined -- was too high for a company that posted $1 billion in profit on revenue of $3.7 billion in 2011.

The stock debuted at over 100 times historical earnings versus Apple's 14 times. Despite that, many investors bet on a modest first-day pop in the stock.

On Thursday, Wall Street may have taken a few cues from the days-old market for Facebook options, which began trading only Tuesday but already rival volumes in Apple Inc, traditionally one of the busiest equity option contracts.

At the closing bell, option traders exchanged 203,000 puts and 182,000 calls in Facebook, yielding a put-to-call ratio of 1.12, according to options analytics firm Trade Alert.

Contracts exist all the way down to a strike price of $5, or up to $65 as far out as January 2014.

The activity highlighted a wide divergence of opinion, with some betting on a rebound while others expect a sustained selloff, analysts say.

"Today is the first day they brought the weekly options that expire next Friday and they are tremendously active," said William Lefkowitz, options strategist at brokerage firm vFinance Investments in New York.

"In general, investors are still expecting volatility in the shares. With options you can go long or short the stock at the fraction of the cost of buying or selling the underlying shares."

(Reporting By Edwin Chan and Doris Frankel; Editing by Jeffrey Benkoe and Steve Orlofsky)

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Technology News: After Facebook, Silicon Valley warily eyes Square

Reuters: Technology News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
After Facebook, Silicon Valley warily eyes Square
May 31st 2012, 22:27

By Sarah McBride

SAN FRANCISCO | Thu May 31, 2012 6:27pm EDT

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - As Silicon Valley scrambles to assess the impact of the Facebook (FB.O) IPO mess, all eyes are on Square.

The much-heralded, next-generation payments company had been aiming to raise its next round of venture capital funds at a valuation of as much as $4 billion - up from $1 billion just a year ago. That is the sort of acceleration in valuation that happened with Facebook prior to its public market debut.

But with Facebook worth $26 billion less than it was just two weeks ago, industry insiders say that concerns about over-exuberance around social media and other Internet companies -- which began to emerge late last year -- have mounted.

"There's a chill settling in over the market," said one late-stage venture capitalist. "Going back to reality is helpful," he added.

The ability of Square, and a handful of other hot Internet start-ups, including Asana, Just Fabulous and Ideeli, to raise money at super-premium valuations is now shaping up as a test of whether Facebook's IPO marks a turning point in the latest tech boom.

Facebook's IPO was a success by one key metric - raising the maximum possible amount of cash in public markets for the company and early investors - but it was a massive failure for later-stage investors and people who bought Facebook shares at the IPO price of $38. The shares traded at $28 on Thursday afternoon.

A number of high-profile start-ups had the luck or foresight to raise money from venture capitalists just ahead of the Facebook IPO. Question-and-answer service Quora, founded by Facebook alumni, raised $50 million recently at a reported $400 million valuation, even though it has no revenue. Online bulletin board Pinterest raised $100 million at a $1.5 billion valuation.

But those who did not get their deals done before the Facebook offering could be in a tricky spot.

Workplace-collaboration network Asana has been talking to venture capitalists about a new round of funding in the $20 million to $30 million range, two sources said. The new round would value the company at around $250 million. Online retailers JustFabulous and Ideeli are both seeking to raise $30 million to$50 million at a $300 million to $500 million valuation, according to another source who had talked to those companies before the Facebook IPO.

The most visible of all is Square, a company run by Twitter co-founder and Silicon Valley darling Jack Dorsey. Square aims to reinvent the payment function with mobile devices and sophisticated software and identity technologies.

Square announced a $100 million investment led by Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers last June, valuing the company at $1 billion. Other backers include Sequoia Capital, Tiger Global Management, and Visa (V.N). Venture capitalists say it is seeking a $4 billion valuation for its next round. A Square spokesman declined to comment.

Venture capitalists generally try to invest in companies they think will be worth at least three to five times more than their initial investment by the time the companies get acquired or go public.

That means Square, to justify a $4 billion valuation, would have to be worth at least $12 billion in a few years - a tall order for a company operating in a business with slim margins, deep-pocketed and established players, and lots of fraud.

Square's fans counter that it is growing quickly and has a unique opportunity to leverage social-media platforms and upend entrenched businesses that are short on innovation.

Asana might have an easier story to sell. It is run by Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz, and the steady monthly revenue it gets from its best customers - a premium service launched in April - could make it popular with investors looking for reliability as well as growth.

Still, the advantage Asana was perceived to enjoy due to enthusiasm around social networks in general and Facebook in particular could now look more like a liability. A spokesman for Asana declined to comment on financing.

JustFabulous and Ideeli may have a tougher time, some venture capitalists say. JustFabulous co-Chief Executive Adam Goldenberg said the company does not comment on financing. A spokeswoman for Ideeli declined to comment.

Most e-commerce companies eventually are acquired at about one to 1.5 times revenue, but in the early stages they ask for valuations of five or 10 times revenue, venture capitalists say. That means a company would have to increase revenue by a factor of 15 for a venture capitalist to make three times its return.

Very high valuations can also create another problem in that they limit the pool of potential acquirers. At a 10-figure valuation, companies including Apple (AAPL.O), Facebook, Google (GOOG.O) or Microsoft (MSFT.O) are almost the only possible buyers - an especially important issue if the IPO market as a whole goes dormant for a time.

Asana last raised funds in 2009, when Andreessen Horowitz and Benchmark Capital committed $10 million. JustFab raised $33 million last year, and Ideeli has raised a total of $70 million, including $41 million last year.

"I think the valuations in the private market are high," said Mary Meeker, a former star Internet analyst and now a partner at venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers.

Speaking at the "D" conference in Southern California, where many Internet industry leaders gathered this week, she added: "We run a billion-dollar digital growth fund at Kleiner Perkins, and we didn't invest a penny in the March quarter ... We just were having trouble getting comfortable."

In recent months, valuations "went crazy," said Loic Le Meur, chief executive of Internet conference Le Web, speaking on the sidelines of the "D" conference. "If it cools down a little bit for valuations, I don't think it's a bad thing."

Still, not everyone in Silicon Valley thinks private-company valuations are going to take a big hit.

"When you look a year from now, two years from now, I'm not sure you're going to say prices came down at high-quality companies," said Sergio Monsalve, an investor at Norwest.

For venture capitalists, "growth is such a huge factor," said GGV Capital's Glenn Solomon. "And there's still a ton of growth out there."

(Reporting By Sarah McBride in San Francisco and Alexei Oreskovic in Rancho Palos Verdes, Calif.; Editing by Jonathan Weber and Steve Orlofsky)

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Technology News: Google accuses Microsoft, Nokia of mobile collusion

Reuters: Technology News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Google accuses Microsoft, Nokia of mobile collusion
May 31st 2012, 21:09

SAN FRANCISCO | Thu May 31, 2012 5:09pm EDT

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Google Inc on Thursday accused Microsoft Corp and Nokia of conspiring to use their patents against smartphone industry rivals, and said it has filed a formal complaint with the European Commission.

In its complaint, Google claimed Microsoft and Nokia, which cooperate on smartphone technology and production, transferred 1,200 patents for assertion to a group called MOSAID, which the company called a "patent troll" -- a term referring to a holder of patents that litigates them aggressively.

"Nokia and Microsoft are colluding to raise the costs of mobile devices for consumers, creating patent trolls that side-step promises both companies have made," the Internet search leader said in a statement. "They should be held accountable, and we hope our complaint spurs others to look into these practices."

Nokia and Microsoft were not immediately available for comment.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Technology News: Oracle can't copyright parts of Java-court ruling

Reuters: Technology News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Oracle can't copyright parts of Java-court ruling
May 31st 2012, 21:02

SAN FRANCISCO | Thu May 31, 2012 5:02pm EDT

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - A U.S. judge rejected Oracle Corp's contention that parts of the Java programming language can be copyrighted, dealing a further blow to Oracle as it seeks damages against Google over intellectual property rights.

The ruling on Thursday came from U.S. District Judge William Alsup, who presided over a recent trial between the two companies in San Francisco. Oracle alleged Google's Android mobile platform of violating its intellectual property rights, but Oracle was unable to win the roughly $1 billion in damages it had sought.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Technology News: Morgan Stanley CEO Gorman defends Facebook IPO conduct

Reuters: Technology News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Morgan Stanley CEO Gorman defends Facebook IPO conduct
May 31st 2012, 21:45

Thu May 31, 2012 4:58pm EDT

(Reuters) - Morgan Stanley chairman and chief executive officer James Gorman defended the securities firm's role in Facebook Inc's tumultuous initial public offering, telling CNBC on Thursday the firm followed standard procedures.

Gorman said there was "no nefarious activity" involved in Facebook's recent IPO and that new technology firms looking to tap the firm to go public won't be turned off.

"We have a long track record" with bringing companies public, Gorman said.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Technology News: After Facebook, Silicon Valley warily eyes Square

Reuters: Technology News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
After Facebook, Silicon Valley warily eyes Square
May 31st 2012, 18:54

By Sarah McBride

SAN FRANCISCO | Thu May 31, 2012 2:54pm EDT

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - As Silicon Valley scrambles to assess the impact of the Facebook IPO mess, all eyes are on Square.

The much-heralded, next-generation payments company had been aiming to raise its next round of venture capital funds at a valuation of as much as $4 billion - up from $1 billion just a year ago. That is the sort of acceleration in valuation that happened with Facebook prior to its public market debut.

But with Facebook worth $26 billion less than it was just two weeks ago, industry insiders say that concerns about overexuberance around social media and other Internet companies -- which began to emerge late last year -- have mounted.

"There's a chill settling in over the market," said one late-stage venture capitalist. "Going back to reality is helpful," he added.

The ability of Square, and a handful of other hot Internet start-ups, including Asana, Just Fabulous and Ideeli, to raise money at super-premium valuations is now shaping up as a test of whether Facebook's IPO marks a turning point in the latest tech boom.

Facebook's IPO was a success by one key metric - raising the maximum possible amount of cash in public markets for the company and early investors - but it was a massive failure for later-stage investors and people who bought Facebook shares at the IPO price of $38. The shares traded at $28 on Thursday afternoon.

A number of high-profile start-ups had the luck or foresight to raise money from venture capitalists just ahead of the Facebook IPO. Question-and-answer service Quora, founded by Facebook alumni, raised $50 million recently at a reported $400 million valuation, even though it has no revenue. Online bulletin board Pinterest raised $100 million at a $1.5 billion valuation.

But those who did not get their deals done before the Facebook offering could be in a tricky spot.

Workplace-collaboration network Asana has been talking to venture capitalists about a new round of funding in the $20 million to $30 million range, two sources said. The new round would value the company at around $250 million. Online retailers JustFabulous and Ideeli are both seeking to raise $30 million to$50 million at a $300 million to $500 million valuation, according to another source who had talked to those companies before the Facebook IPO.

The most visible of all is Square, a company run by Twitter co-founder and Silicon Valley darling Jack Dorsey. Square aims to reinvent the payment function with mobile devices and sophisticated software and identity technologies.

Square announced a $100 million investment led by Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers last June, valuing the company at $1 billion. Other backers include Sequoia Capital, Tiger Global Management, and Visa. Venture capitalists say it is seeking a $4 billion valuation for its next round. A Square spokesman declined to comment.

Venture capitalists generally try to invest in companies they think will be worth at least three to five times more than their initial investment by the time the companies get acquired or go public.

That means Square, to justify a $4 billion valuation, would have to be worth at least $12 billion in a few years - a tall order for a company operating in a business with slim margins, deep-pocketed and established players, and lots of fraud.

Square's fans counter that it is growing quickly and has a unique opportunity to leverage social-media platforms and upend entrenched businesses that are short on innovation.

Asana might have an easier story to sell. It is run by Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz, and the steady monthly revenue it gets from its best customers - a premium service launched in April - could make it popular with investors looking for reliability as well as growth.

Still, the advantage Asana was perceived to enjoy due to enthusiasm around social networks in general and Facebook in particular could now look more like a liability. A spokesman for Asana declined to comment on financing.

JustFabulous and Ideeli may have a tougher time, some venture capitalists say. JustFabulous co-Chief Executive Adam Goldenberg said the company does not comment on financing. A spokeswoman for Ideeli declined to comment.

Most e-commerce companies eventually are acquired at about one to 1.5 times revenue, but in the early stages they ask for valuations of five or 10 times revenue, venture capitalists say. That means a company would have to increase revenue by a factor of 15 for a venture capitalist to make three times its return.

Very high valuations can also create another problem in that they limit the pool of potential acquirers. At a 10-figure valuation, companies including Apple, Facebook, Google or Microsoft are almost the only possible buyers - an especially important issue if the IPO market as a whole goes dormant for a time.

Asana last raised funds in 2009, when Andreessen Horowitz and Benchmark Capital committed $10 million. JustFab raised $33 million last year, and Ideeli has raised a total of $70 million, including $41 million last year.

"I think the valuations in the private market are high," said Mary Meeker, a former star Internet analyst and now a partner at venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers.

Speaking at the "D" conference in Southern California, where many Internet industry leaders gathered this week, she added: "We run a billion-dollar digital growth fund at Kleiner Perkins, and we didn't invest a penny in the March quarter ... We just were having trouble getting comfortable."

In recent months, valuations "went crazy," said Loic Le Meur, chief executive of Internet conference Le Web, speaking on the sidelines of the "D" conference. "If it cools down a little bit for valuations, I don't think it's a bad thing."

Still, not everyone in Silicon Valley thinks private-company valuations are going to take a big hit.

"When you look a year from now, two years from now, I'm not sure you're going to say prices came down at high-quality companies," said Sergio Monsalve, an investor at Norwest.

For venture capitalists, "growth is such a huge factor," said Golden Gate Ventures' Glenn Solomon. "And there's still a ton of growth out there."

(Reporting By Sarah McBride in San Francisco and Alexei Oreskovic in Rancho Palos Verdes, Calif.; Editing by Jonathan Weber and Steve Orlofsky)

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Technology News: U.S. lawmakers blast U.N. "power grab" for the Net

Reuters: Technology News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
U.S. lawmakers blast U.N. "power grab" for the Net
May 31st 2012, 19:26

An internet cable is seen at a server room in this picture illustration taken in Warsaw. REUTERS/Kacper Pempel

An internet cable is seen at a server room in this picture illustration taken in Warsaw.

Credit: Reuters/Kacper Pempel

By Jasmin Melvin

WASHINGTON | Thu May 31, 2012 3:26pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. lawmakers on Thursday said they are united when it comes to keeping the Internet free from centralized control and preventing the United Nations from gaining power over Web content and infrastructure.

The U.S. government wants to bring as much ammunition as possible to a December meeting in Dubai where delegations from 193 countries will discuss whether to hand governance of the Internet over to the United Nations.

The United States fears December's treaty-writing conference could turn the Internet into a political bargaining chip and could empower efforts by countries like China, Russia and Iran to erode Internet freedoms and isolate their populations.

"We may have our differences on domestic telecommunications policy, but having those policies decided at the international level would be the worst thing that could happen," Representative Marsha Blackburn said at a hearing before a House Energy and Commerce subcommittee.

The Tennessee Republican commended the Obama administration's efforts to thwart giving an international governing body power over the Internet.

A bipartisan group of lawmakers on Wednesday introduced a resolution to reject the proposed international takeover of the Internet and preserve the current "multi-stakeholder" model of governance.

"In many ways, this is a referendum on the future of the Internet," Republican Representative Mary Bono Mack said at Thursday's hearing.

"If this power grab is successful, I'm concerned that the next Arab Spring will instead become a Russia Winter where free speech is chilled, not encouraged, and the Internet becomes a wasteland of unfilled hopes, dreams and opportunities," said Bono Mack, a sponsor of the resolution.

Social media sites Twitter, Facebook and Google's YouTube played a big role in last year's "Arab Spring" revolution.

"LETHAL THREAT"

The Internet is currently policed loosely, with technical bodies such as the Internet Engineering Task Force, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers and the World Wide Web Consortium largely dictating its infrastructure and management. The United States holds significant sway with those bodies.

When the delegations gather in Dubai in December, they will renegotiate a U.N. treaty last revisited in 1988, and debate proposals that would consolidate control over the Internet with the United Nations' International Telecommunications Union (ITU).

"During the treaty negotiations, the most lethal threat to Internet freedom may not come from a full-frontal assault but through insidious and seemingly innocuous expansions of inter-governmental powers," said Federal Communications Commissioner Robert McDowell.

Proposals out of the Middle East, McDowell said, would change the definition of telecommunications in a way that arguably would include the Internet, and would suddenly sweep an entire industry into the rubric of ITU rules.

The Republican commissioner blasted claims from ITU leadership that no nations have proposed expanding the ITU's jurisdiction to the Internet.

"An infinite number of avenues exist to accomplish the same goal, and it is camouflaged subterfuge that proponents of Internet freedom should watch for most vigilantly," he said.

The lawmakers fear that countries like China, Russia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and others could politick smaller nations who have little interest in the issue to back them in giving them greater ability to isolate their populations and silence political dissidents.

The United States fears that authoritarian regimes will campaign for their initiatives by promising to back proposals from developing countries that would like to see tariffs on content-heavy Internet companies such as Google, Facebook and Netflix.

"Some ITU officials have dismissed our concerns over these issues as mere election year politics, and nothing could be further from the truth," McDowell said. "The threats are real and not imagined."

(Reporting By Jasmin Melvin; Editing by Gary Hill)

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

 
Great HTML Templates from easytemplates.com.